Article Notes
- True aortal compression is relatively uncommon (Higuchi 2015, Lee 2012).
- Caval compression is probably near-universal, but also usually not improved by a mere 15 degree tilt. (An impractical 30 degrees is more likely required for meaningful impact!) (Palmer 2015).
- Caval compression probably has limited haemodynamic or fetal consequences in the fit, well, term parturient (Higuchi 2015; Lee 2012).
- Judicious use of vasopressor infusions may obviate the need for traditional uterine displacement (Lee 2017; Farber 2017).
- Hepatic failure
- Neurological disease
- High-neostigmine dose > 60 mcg/kg
- Metastatic solid tumour
- Female sex
- Less than 120 min between NMBD administration and extubation
- Aminosteroid NMBD
- BMI more than 35
- Absence of nurse anaesthetist (CRNA)
- Having an experienced surgeon
Is the conventional assumption that left-lateral tilt and uterine displacement avoids aortocaval compression during Caesarean section actually valid?
50 years of assumed orthodoxy is challenged by studies showing that:
Time to change practice then?
Not quite yet...
Case report from Yamaguchi, Japan describing a confirmed sugammadex anaphylaxis in a 50kg woman receiving 4mg/kg sugammadex.
Notably, follow-up skin prick testing strongly suggests #1 hypersensitivity to free sugammadex molecules, rather than the sugammadex-rocuronium complex, and #2 hypersensitivity appears to be dose-related.
Why is this important?
First, because it identifies new novel risk factors for residual neuromuscular block (experienced surgeon, non-CRNA anesthesia provider...) and secondly, because the subtext reveals the lengths our specialty goes to avoid simply monitoring using qualitative NMB monitoring (TOFR)!
What did they find?
Rudolph et al. created a REsidual neuromuscular block Prediction Score (REPS) using Massachusetts General PACU data, applying covariate analysis to identify 10 risk factors, some more surprising than others:
Be smart:
These risk factors might suggest patients who need more careful monitoring, but you will probably be better off just using qualitative monitoring routinely. The utility of REPS itself is only modest with NPV & PPVs of 85% each.
The other takeaway is that rNMB is still demonstratably common, occurring in 20% of this cohort!
While there is both utility and some interesting insights from the LAS VEGAS risk score research, it also seems to have largely confirmed that higher risk patients, having more invasive or major surgery, and those who misbehave intraoperatively are more likely to experience postoperative pulmonary complications...