• Collection

    Non-technical qualities of anesthesiology

       

    Daniel Jolley.

    8 articles.

    Created May 21, 2015, last updated 28 days ago.


    Collection: 8, Score: 935, Trend score: 0, Read count: 936, Articles count: 8, Created: 2015-05-21 02:09:43 UTC. Updated: 2020-07-15 03:53:03 UTC.

    Notes

     
    Do you have a pearl, summary or comment to save or share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    Collected Articles

    • Int Anesthesiol Clin · Jan 2014

      Review

      Decision-making errors in anesthesiology.

      no abstract available

      expand abstract… or not…

    • Int Anesthesiol Clin · Jan 2014

      Review

      Characteristics of a high-quality anesthesia practice.

      no abstract available

      read more… or not…

    • Br J Anaesth · Jan 2013

      How excellent anaesthetists perform in the operating theatre: a qualitative study on non-technical skills.

      Excellent anaesthetists were identified by anaesthesia nurses as being:

      1. Organised & focused: structured, responsible, and focused approach to work tasks.
      2. Good communicators: clear and informative, briefing of team about the plan before induction.
      3. Respectful of complexity: humble to the complexity of anaesthesia, admitting own fallibility.
      4. Patient-centred: personal contact with the patient before induction.
      5. Good situational awareness: fluent in practical work without losing overview.
      6. Calm and clear in critical situations, being able to change to a strong leading style.
      summary

      expand abstract… or not…

    • Anesthesiology · Dec 2018

      Review

      Quality Anesthesia: Medicine Measures, Patients Decide.

      Quality has been defined by six domains: effective, equitable, timely, efficient, safe, and patient centered. Quality of anesthesia care can be improved through measurement, either through local measures in quality improvement or through national measures in value-based purchasing programs. Death directly related to anesthesia care has been reduced, but must be measured beyond simple mortality. ⋯ Anesthesiologists can also impact public health by being engaged in improving cognitive recovery after surgery and addressing the opiate crisis. Going forward, we must focus on what patients want and deserve: improved patient-oriented outcomes and satisfaction with our care. By listening to our patients and being engaged in the entire perioperative process, we can make the greatest impact on perioperative care.

      read more… mark as read…

    • Anesthesiology · Sep 2018

      Review

      Critical Role of the Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Relationship for Patient Safety.

      The surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship is probably the most critical in determining overall team performance.

      pearl

      explore further… or not…

    • Br J Anaesth · Jul 2010

      Review

      Anaesthetists' non-technical skills.

      This review presents the background to the development of the anaesthetists' non-technical skills (ANTS) taxonomy and behaviour rating tool, which is the first non-technical skills framework specifically designed for anaesthetists. We share the experience of the anaesthetists who designed ANTS in relation to applying it in a department of anaesthesia, using it in a simulation centre, and the process of introducing it to the profession on a national basis. We also consider how ANTS is being applied in relation to training and research in other countries and finally, we discuss emerging issues in relation to the introduction of a non-technical skills approach in anaesthesia.

      explore further… or just mark as read…

    • Br J Anaesth · May 2003

      Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system.

      Non-technical skills are critical for good anaesthetic practice but are not addressed explicitly in normal training. Realization of the need to train and assess these skills is growing, but these activities must be based on properly developed skills frameworks and validated measurement tools. A prototype behavioural marker system was developed using human factors research techniques. The aim of this study was to conduct an experimental evaluation to establish its basic psychometric properties and usability. ⋯ The findings of the evaluation indicated that the ANTS system has a satisfactory level of validity, reliability and usability in an experimental setting, provided users receive adequate training. It is now ready to be tested in real training environments, so that full guidelines can be developed for its integration into the anaesthetic curriculum.

      read more… mark as read…

    • Br J Anaesth · Apr 2010

      Anaesthesia non-technical skills: Can anaesthetists be trained to reliably use this behavioural marker system in 1 day?

      Performance assessment is becoming increasingly necessary in the medical workplace. Hospitals and patients expect safety, and under-performance by a doctor can compromise standards. By describing and quantifying performance, positive behaviour can be encouraged and unsafe behaviour remedied. Anaesthesia Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) is a behavioural marker system that can be used to assess non-technical skills in the workplace. ⋯ Anaesthetists could not be trained to reliably use ANTS as a summative assessment tool using our 1 day programme. There was an inadequate correlation of scores between participants and experts. Two major problems contributed to the lack of agreement. Observed behaviours were often misclassified into the incorrect element and safety beliefs varied among anaesthetists. Other reasons for the failure to achieve success and potential future direction are discussed.

      read more… or just mark as read…

    collapse collection…


Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
988,657 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.